Showing Its Hand — Europe’s Need for Natural Gas

January 19, 2023

Sources: Bloomberg, New York Mercantile Exchange Sources: Bloomberg, New York Mercantile Exchange

As we approach the one-year anniversary of Russia’s horrific invasion of Ukraine, it’s evident that the world has changed dramatically as a result. The loss of life in Ukraine and the pain and suffering caused by the invasion are irreparable. Hopefully, the war will end soon, giving the country a chance to rebuild. 

One of the first steps Russia took after invading Ukraine was weaponizing its energy supplies to Europe. As a result, Europe had to move quickly to shore up other energy sources to power its homes, industries and utilities. Prior to the invasion, Europe imported 83% of its natural gas and a significant portion of that came directly from Russia via pipeline, according to the European Council and the Council of the European Union.1 

In the months following the invasion, Russia began to restrict the flow of that natural gas via its Nord Stream pipeline. Then, in the fall of 2022, the pipeline exploded due to sabotage.2 As European nations prepared for the winter (when more natural gas is used to heat homes), it became even more imperative for them to store this vital resource. 

Amazingly, Europe was able to shore up its storage in just a few months, thanks in large part to U.S.-based natural gas producers, which were able to ship out a significant amount of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to Europe and the rest of the world. 

Fortunately, the winter weather in the U.S. and Europe has been very mild so far, allowing natural gas storage to stay at high levels. In fact, the levels are so high that LNG tankers have been idling off the coast of Europe, awaiting room to unload their cargoes. As a result, we’ve seen a significant collapse in natural gas prices worldwide — to the point that the prices today are even lower than before Russia invaded Ukraine.

Interestingly, as seen in this week’s Chart of the Week, the price for natural gas in Europe had been moving up relative to the price in the U.S. since the middle of 2021, well before the invasion. However, in the spring of 2021, Russia began amassing troops near the Ukraine border and conducting training exercises. Natural gas prices started moving higher around that same time as the world and Europe, in particular, began to prepare for the eventual invasion and its potential ramifications. 

Perhaps natural gas prices moved up too far, too fast, as European prices neared $100/Metric Million British Thermal Unit (MMBtu) by August 2022 compared to natural gas prices in the U.S. approaching $10/MMBtu. This move demonstrated how potentially vulnerable Europe is to an energy shortfall and how critical natural gas is to the world. 

Today, with the price in Europe coming back down to about $20/MMBtu compared to about $3.50 for the U.S., it still makes a lot of sense for U.S. producers to export LNG to Europe. The weather has been a great savior for Europe and its energy prices so far this winter, and storage levels remain high. Russia has left its mark on the rest of the world in many ways. This invasion has certainly put Europe on notice that it cannot rely on just Russia for its natural gas, and preparing for eventual colder weather (this year or incoming winters) is the only option. 

Key Takeaway     

Many U.S. natural gas companies can produce gas for significantly below the current $3.50 level and therefore will continue to be able to supply natural gas in the U.S. and abroad. U.S. natural gas companies should have a strong future as they are some of the lowest-cost producers in the world and provide a resource that is critical to today’s global infrastructure, as well as being a key part of the energy transition. 

Clearly, the lower natural gas prices today compared to significantly higher prices in 2022 will pose earnings headwinds for the year ahead. Keep an eye out for opportunities to own or lend to the best and lowest-cost operators in the U.S., which are even more valuable today given the events that have transpired in Russia and Europe.

     

Sources:

1Source: Council of the European Union- Infographic - Where does the EU’s gas come from?; 11/7/22  

2Source: New York Times- In Nord Stream Mystery, Baltic Seabed Provides a Nearly Ideal Crime Scene; 12/26/22

Tags: Natural gas | Russia | Energy Sector | Earnings

< Go to Chart of the Week

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Subscribe to Our Publications